{"id":18559,"date":"2025-10-30T12:53:00","date_gmt":"2025-10-30T10:53:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/uabio.org\/?p=18559"},"modified":"2025-10-30T16:45:37","modified_gmt":"2025-10-30T14:45:37","slug":"otsinka-mozhlyvyh-znachen-benchmarkiv-cbam","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/uabio.org\/en\/news\/18559\/","title":{"rendered":"Estimating possible benchmark values CBAM"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><em><strong>To calculate the financial obligations of importers in the EU<\/strong> <strong>within the framework of <\/strong>the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism(<strong>CBAM<\/strong>), <strong>a key element is the value of the benchmarks<\/strong><\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These values determine what proportion of specific greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions will be covered by free allocation between 2026 and 2034. This, in turn, determines what proportion of the embedded CO\u2082 emissions importers must cover with CBAM certificates and <strong>how much the cost of import into the EU will increase<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1920\" height=\"1080\" src=\"https:\/\/uabio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Banery-21-1.png\" alt=\"\u0411\u0435\u043d\u0447\u043c\u0430\u0440\u043a\u0438 CBAM: \u043e\u0446\u0456\u043d\u043a\u0430 \u043c\u043e\u0436\u043b\u0438\u0432\u0438\u0445 \u0437\u043d\u0430\u0447\u0435\u043d\u044c\n\" class=\"wp-image-18606\" style=\"width:860px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/uabio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Banery-21-1.png 1920w, https:\/\/uabio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Banery-21-1-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/uabio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Banery-21-1-1536x864.png 1536w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1920px) 100vw, 1920px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The role of benchmarks during the CBAM definitive period<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>The impact of the benchmarks will be particularly significant in the first year of the definitive period of the CBAM, in 2026<\/strong>, when the cancellation of free allowances from the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) will be 2.5% and the CBAM factor will be 97.5%. Thereafter, taking into account the gradual reduction of the CBAM factor, the impact of the CBAM benchmarks (and, consequently, the specific emissions covered by free allocation) on the amount of specific embedded emissions that will have to be paid for <strong>will decrease to zero in 2034. <\/strong>Then, certificates will have to be purchased for <strong>the total number of embedded emissions<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A detailed description of the components of the formula for calculating the number of CBAM certificates (which authorised declarants will have to surrender for emissions embedded in imported goods) is presented in the publication:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a href=\"https:\/\/uabio.org\/en\/news\/17359\/\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/uabio.org\/en\/news\/17359\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Calculation of obligations for surrender of CBAM certificates for imported goods in the EU<\/a><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The formula below illustrates this calculation:<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1566\" height=\"417\" src=\"https:\/\/uabio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/cbameng.png\" alt=\"\u0424\u043e\u0440\u043c\u0443\u043b\u0430 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0440\u043e\u0437\u0440\u0430\u0445\u0443\u043d\u043a\u0443 \u043a\u0456\u043b\u044c\u043a\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456 \u0441\u0435\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0444\u0456\u043a\u0430\u0442\u0456\u0432 CBAM (\u044f\u043a\u0456 \u0443\u043f\u043e\u0432\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0456 \u0434\u0435\u043a\u043b\u0430\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0442\u0438 \u043f\u043e\u0432\u0438\u043d\u043d\u0456 \u0431\u0443\u0434\u0443\u0442\u044c \u0437\u0434\u0430\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0438 \u0437\u0430 \u0432\u043a\u043b\u044e\u0447\u0435\u043d\u0456 \u0432\u0438\u043a\u0438\u0434\u0438 \u0432 \u0456\u043c\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0456 \u0442\u043e\u0432\u0430\u0440\u0438)\" class=\"wp-image-18605\" style=\"width:860px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/uabio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/cbameng.png 1566w, https:\/\/uabio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/cbameng-768x205.png 768w, https:\/\/uabio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/cbameng-1536x409.png 1536w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1566px) 100vw, 1566px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p>The industry <strong>is pushing for the European Commission <\/strong>to publish these values. However, <strong>as of today<\/strong>, with less than three months left until the start of <strong>the CBAM definitive period<\/strong>, this has not yet been done.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Benchmark models by CBAMBOO<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/cbamboo.com\/blog\/The-CBAMBOO-estimate-benchmark-values\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/cbamboo.com\/blog\/The-CBAMBOO-estimate-benchmark-values\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><strong>Technical Note introducing the benchmark model<\/strong><\/a> was published on <strong>the CBAMBOO platform<\/strong>. Let us consider the approaches that, according to this report, <strong>will be used <\/strong>to determine these benchmarks:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Benchmark values will be based on benchmarks <strong>the EU ETS <\/strong>for free allocation of emission allowances for the period <strong>2026-2030 <\/strong>are currently being updated. This means that the final values will not be available until <strong>the first half of 2026<\/strong>.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>The EU ETS benchmarks <\/strong>are based on <strong>the 10% most efficient installations <\/strong>in the EU and are applied to <strong>production processes<\/strong>. Benchmarks <strong>CBAM<\/strong>, instead, will apply to <strong>products<\/strong>.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>There may be <strong>one benchmark value <\/strong>for one commodity code (CN), or <strong>one benchmark value <\/strong>will apply to several commodity codes (for similar production processes). Alternatively, one commodity code may have <strong>more than one benchmark value <\/strong>(for example, in the case of primary and secondary steel products).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>In the absence of clear information on the benchmark values from the European Commission, CBAMBOO <\/strong>experts observe <strong>significant differences in the intermediate benchmark values <\/strong>adopted by different market participants and even different regulators.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>One conservative approach has been to apply the current EU ETS benchmark value to products in the equivalent aggregate category where possible. This leads to a benchmark for iron and steel of 0.215 t CO<sub>2<\/sub>\/t, based on the equivalent ETS value for carbon steel produced in electric arc furnaces (EAF). However, other approaches exist with significantly higher values. In particular, <strong>the French National Competent Authority (NCA) <\/strong>recently published a calculator that set the benchmark for iron and steel products at 2.15 t CO<sub>2<\/sub>\/t.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Consider an example: importing steel fasteners into the EU. If the embedded emissions are <strong>2.5 t CO\u2082 per tonne <\/strong>of product, the cost of a <strong>CBAM certificate <\/strong>is <strong>\u20ac75\/t CO\u2082<\/strong>, and the producer does not pay for the emissions, then in 2026 the importer will pay <strong>between \u20ac30 and \u20ac172 per tonne of product for the certificates. This wide range (which is due to <\/strong>the benchmark range of 0.215 to 2.15) makes import <strong>decisions very difficult.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>CBAMBOO <\/strong>model, designed for benchmark evaluation, <strong>CBAM narrows <\/strong>this range and <strong>is based on <\/strong>three documents:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/climate.ec.europa.eu\/system\/files\/2021-10\/policy_ets_allowances_bm_curve_factsheets_en.pdf\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/climate.ec.europa.eu\/system\/files\/2021-10\/policy_ets_allowances_bm_curve_factsheets_en.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><strong>EU ETS benchmarks for 2021\u20132025<\/strong><\/a><strong>;<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/op.europa.eu\/en\/publication-detail\/-\/publication\/85cb6b79-60d7-11ee-9220-01aa75ed71a1\/language-en\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/op.europa.eu\/en\/publication-detail\/-\/publication\/85cb6b79-60d7-11ee-9220-01aa75ed71a1\/language-en\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><strong>Report of the Joint Research Centre (JRC) of the European Commission for 2023 \u201cGreenhouse gas emission intensities of the steel, fertilisers, aluminium and cement industries in the EU and its main trading partners\u201d<\/strong><\/a>, which estimates the average emission factors for each <strong>commodity code <\/strong>in the <strong>CBAM list <\/strong>for the EU&#8217;s main trading partners;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/climate.ec.europa.eu\/document\/download\/a4c0cb40-35f9-4705-882d-b55382d03e9a_en?filename=2_gd2_allocation_methodologies_en.pdf&#038;prefLang=mt\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/climate.ec.europa.eu\/document\/download\/a4c0cb40-35f9-4705-882d-b55382d03e9a_en?filename=2_gd2_allocation_methodologies_en.pdf&#038;prefLang=mt\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><strong>Guidance Document No. 2 on the harmonised free allocation methodology for the EU ETS \u2013 2024 Revision<\/strong><\/a>, which attempts to map benchmark values to CBAM commodity codes.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Calculations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>For each CBAM sector, <strong>efficiency factor values were calculated based on EU ETS benchmark data<\/strong>. This factor measures the percentage difference of the 2021-2025 benchmark (BM) relative to the average emission factor (EF) for all installations involved in the production processes within that sector. The results of the assessment are presented in the table below:<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1262\" height=\"772\" src=\"https:\/\/uabio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/table1CBAM.png\" alt=\"\u0420\u043e\u0437\u0440\u0430\u0445\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043d\u0456 \u0437\u043d\u0430\u0447\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f \u043a\u043e\u0435\u0444\u0456\u0446\u0456\u0454\u043d\u0442\u0443 \u0435\u0444\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0432\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456 \u043d\u0430 \u043e\u0441\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0456 \u0435\u0442\u0430\u043b\u043e\u043d\u043d\u0438\u0445 \u0434\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0445 EU ETS\" class=\"wp-image-18608\" style=\"width:860px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/uabio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/table1CBAM.png 1262w, https:\/\/uabio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/table1CBAM-768x470.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1262px) 100vw, 1262px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p>Then, from the values of the individual product efficiency factors, <strong>the minimum, average, and maximum efficiency factors <\/strong>for each <strong>CBAM sector were calculated<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1428\" height=\"443\" src=\"https:\/\/uabio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/table2CBAM.png\" alt=\"\u041c\u0456\u043d\u0456\u043c\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u0438\u0439, \u0441\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u0456\u0439 \u0442\u0430 \u043c\u0430\u043a\u0441\u0438\u043c\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u043a\u043e\u0435\u0444\u0456\u0446\u0456\u0454\u043d\u0442\u0438 \u0435\u0444\u0435\u043a\u0442\u0438\u0432\u043d\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0456 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043a\u043e\u0436\u043d\u043e\u0433\u043e \u0441\u0435\u043a\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0430 CBAM\" class=\"wp-image-18609\" style=\"width:860px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/uabio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/table2CBAM.png 1428w, https:\/\/uabio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/table2CBAM-768x238.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1428px) 100vw, 1428px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p>These <strong>efficiency factors are then <\/strong>applied to <strong>the default <\/strong>emission factor values for the EU-27 from the <strong>JRC report<\/strong>. The results of CBAMBOO calculations <strong>for the lower, middle and higher benchmark values <\/strong>for individual product types <strong>are presented in the table:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1342\" height=\"565\" src=\"https:\/\/uabio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/table3CBAM.png\" alt=\"\u0420\u0435\u0437\u0443\u043b\u044c\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0438 \u0440\u043e\u0437\u0440\u0430\u0445\u0443\u043d\u043a\u0456\u0432 CBAMBOO \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043d\u0438\u0436\u0447\u0438\u0445, \u0441\u0435\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043d\u0456\u0445 \u0442\u0430 \u0432\u0438\u0441\u043e\u043a\u0438\u0445 \u0437\u043d\u0430\u0447\u0435\u043d\u044c \u0431\u0435\u043d\u0447\u043c\u0430\u0440\u043a\u0456\u0432 \u0434\u043b\u044f \u043e\u043a\u0440\u0435\u043c\u0438\u0445 \u0432\u0438\u0434\u0456\u0432 \u043f\u0440\u043e\u0434\u0443\u043a\u0446\u0456\u0457\" class=\"wp-image-18610\" style=\"width:860px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/uabio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/table3CBAM.png 1342w, https:\/\/uabio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/table3CBAM-768x323.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1342px) 100vw, 1342px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p>It should be noted that the resulting benchmark values do not take into account differences in production methods. Using a similar approach, indicative benchmarks can be calculated for goods with other CN codes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In general, the proposed <strong>CBAMBOO approach <\/strong>can be used to <strong>estimate the financial obligations of importers under CBAM from the beginning of the definitive period<\/strong> in 2026<strong>. <\/strong>These costs will determine the final cost of imports and, accordingly, will influence the <strong>choice of supplier<\/strong>. Ukrainian manufacturers need to take this factor into account to <strong>maintain their positions <\/strong>in the EU market.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p><em>It should be noted that <strong>this estimate is indicative and can be used only until the European Commission publishes the official CBAM benchmark values<\/strong>.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p>The publication was prepared within the framework of the project&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/uabio.org\/en\/news\/17064\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u201c<strong>Technical Assistance for CBAM good exports from UA to EU<\/strong>\u201c<\/a>, which is implemented with the support of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Netherlands Enterprise Agency.&nbsp;Funding is provided by the Private Sector Development Program of the Netherlands Enterprise Agency\/<a href=\"https:\/\/www.rvo.nl\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">The Netherlands Enterprise Agency<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>The project \u201cTechnical Assistance for CBAM good exports from UA to EU\u201d began on November 25, 2024, and will last until February 28, 2026. This project is implemented with the support of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Netherlands Enterprise Agency.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>To calculate the financial obligations of importers in the EU within the framework of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism(CBAM), a key element is the value of the benchmarks. These values determine what proportion of specific greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions will be covered by free allocation between 2026 and 2034. This, in turn, determines what proportion [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":18566,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[57,7,13,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18559","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cbam","category-materials","category-uabio-news","category-news"],"views":103,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/uabio.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18559","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/uabio.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/uabio.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uabio.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uabio.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18559"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/uabio.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18559\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uabio.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/18566"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/uabio.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18559"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uabio.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18559"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uabio.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18559"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}